A decision framework for risk, incidents and improvement
This is for marketing and IT teams that need to decide what should be fixed now, maintained routinely or developed next on a live website. Start from evidence: impact on critical journeys, security exposure, recurrence, dependencies and the effort to change safely—not ticket volume or the loudest request. Priority classes and any response targets are defined in the engagement; this framework adds no universal SLA.
- Incident: restore an affected journey first; record impact, owner, escalation and the next update through the agreed channels.
- Problem: investigate repeated incidents and agree a corrective action rather than repeatedly applying the same workaround.
- Maintenance: review CMS and dependency changes, security findings and performance regressions through a tested release with rollback conditions.
- Enhancement: compare proposed improvements by user/business need, risk, dependencies and effort; approve the next backlog slice with the client.
- Review: record what was tested and released, what remains unresolved and why; use that record to adjust the next plan.
- Boundary: infrastructure incidents, formal penetration tests, certification and large new projects need their own owners and scope; maintenance does not guarantee security or commercial outcomes.